Una mirada villana a GNU Social
  • Login
Nodo en pruebas, reclamaciones a @lamaestraarmera
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Craig Maloney ☕ (craigmaloney@octodon.social)'s status on Friday, 14-Aug-2020 01:18:59 CEST Craig Maloney ☕ Craig Maloney ☕
    Remote profile options...

    The phrase "Give me convenience or give me death" seems to ring true for a lot of folks, developers or otherwise. Convenience is what will be our undoing. (I've been with FOSS software for 25+ years, so I speak from experience).

    In conversation about 5 months ago from octodon.social permalink
    • El Dorado (mike@z.macgirvin.com)'s status on Friday, 14-Aug-2020 01:18:59 CEST El Dorado El Dorado
      Remote profile options...
      in reply to
      • Charles U. Farley
      I remember the original announcement - they used it for Netscape Netcenter to fetch Associated Press articles for the Netscape home page. I was around when David Winer "claimed it" and changed a few things to support podcast "attachment" (note this is not plural - that was the downfall of RSS). Then he gave the IP rights to Harvard Law School. Atom was created to resolve the attachment and IP situations. Then Google came out with phase one of EEE and produced bastard feeds that were really RSS 0.96 (complete with Dublin Core) or whatever wrapped in Atom - because they could. This meant if your software once read a single format you had to adapt it to handle all of them, plus Yahoo media and Dublin Core and a dozen other microformats. This killed off a lot of readers so Google could dominate. Then atom was extended by ActivityStreams1 and turned into a federation protocol (OStatus). Then Google killed off both their own feeds and later their reader product. So I kind of understand the mess. My best advice is still not to maintain the steaming pile of shit but I don't have any real problem with it. Atom (without activities and without embedded RSS) isn't bad - but otherwise we're basically just choosing which piles of shit to rally behind. Actually for my own software I should probably go back to pure Atom - as I don't need to federate with OStatus these days and I admittedly added in my own stuff to support DFRN over OStatus a decade ago. I'm not trying to get in a fight - just thinking out loud. So pure Atom (WITH discovery) is what I choose to support after weighing the alternatives. I'll push it out today or tomorrow after I remove the extra baggage.
      In conversation about 5 months ago permalink
      Fedizen4 likes this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Una mirada villana a GNU Social is a social network. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.0-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Una mirada villana a GNU Social content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.